Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044184›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

Physicians' appraisal of parental concerns: a qualitative assessment.

Laura Cuypers, Cato Dessers, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Jaan Toelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura CuypersFaculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Cato DessersFaculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Birgitte SchoenmakersDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1909-9613
Jaan ToelenDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium jaan.toelen@uzleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9339-5408

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical encounters with children and their parents, physicians rely on both analytical and non-analytical factors to assess the clinical problem. Research on clinical gut feeling has recognised this as a significant diagnostic factor, yet little is known about how physicians evaluate parental concerns.

aimTo investigate which parent- and physician-related factors influence a physician's assessment of parental concerns. DESIGN AND

settingNine qualitative semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 15 GPs and 15 paediatricians in Belgium between May and August 2022.

methodThe interview transcripts were independently coded and analysed thematically using the constant comparative analysis method.

resultsThe factors that physicians use to assess parental concerns can be categorised into four groups: parent-related, physician-related, context-related, and child-related factors. Within each category, there are multiple determinants, with the most influential being having multiple children as a parent, the physician's work experience, and disease severity.

conclusionThis study confirms some determining factors that have already been described in the literature, but it also identifies new determinants (for example, having multiple children as a parent and physician fatigue). Quantitative research could assess the extent to which the identified factors are involved in the assessment of gut feeling.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelParentsPediatriciansAdultBelgiumChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchClinical gut feelingfocus groupsparental concernphysician-patient relationsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40044184
PMCPMC12723510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.