Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044180›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

Patients' perceptions on reasons for self-referring to the emergency department shortly before a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study.

Xavier Bosch, Elisabet Montori-Palacin, Pedro Moreno, Ana-Maria Guio, Alfonso López-Soto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xavier BoschDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain xavbosch@clinic.cat.ORCID 0000-0001-8157-541X
Elisabet Montori-PalacinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro MorenoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain.
Ana-Maria GuioDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain.
Alfonso López-SotoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8157-541X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome patients are diagnosed with cancer following self-referral to the emergency department (ED), even after consulting in primary care; however, the rationale and factors involved in the decision to self-refer are largely unknown.

aimTo explore patients' perceptions on reasons for emergency self-referral shortly before a cancer diagnosis. DESIGN &

settingQualitative interview study at a high-volume public institution in Barcelona.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with two patient groups: patients who self-referred as emergencies and never consulted primary care (non-consulters), and patients who self-referred despite consulting primary care (consulters). Data were analysed by two independent coders - an emergency doctor and a primary care physician - using a codebook approach to thematic analysis.

resultsFifteen non-consulters and 17 consulters were interviewed. Non-consulters were more likely to belong to disadvantaged and minoritised ethnic communities. Reasons why participants self-referred to the ED were categorised under four themes: urgency/distress, advantages of the ED, quality care, and access to primary care. There was little variation between patient groups in their experiences and perceptions regarding pain intensity and related distress, and EDs' advantages in terms of accessibility and convenience. Cancer fear, uncertainty about symptoms, and frustration in accessing primary care due to language barriers were unique among non-consulters, leading to help-seeking delays. Patients' perception of the ED as a facility that provides high-quality care and is able to meet all medical needs emerged as a distinct theme among consulters.

conclusionHealthcare organisations and public health services bear the responsibility to promote patient education and improve communication regarding the specific roles and purposes of primary care and the ED. Increasing awareness and developing community-based programmes that target cancer fear and fatalism may encourage early presentation to primary care, especially among underrepresented and minoritised ethnic groups.Delete.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalNeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSpaincancer diagnosisdecision makingemergency presentationpatient perspectivesprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID40044180
PMCPMC12754660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.