Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044137›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2025

Efficiency of reverse genetics methods for rescuing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Chang-Joo Park, Taehun Kim, Seung-Min Yoo, Myung-Shin Lee, Nam-Hyuk Cho, Changhoon Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chang-Joo ParkDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35233, Republic of Korea.
Taehun KimDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03083, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Min YooDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35233, Republic of Korea.
Myung-Shin LeeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35233, Republic of Korea.
Nam-Hyuk ChoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03083, Republic of Korea.
Changhoon ParkDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35233, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Education RS-2021-NR064485Ministry of Health and Welfare HV22C0181Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning 2021M3A9I2080489Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning RS-2024-00349208National Research Foundation of Korea
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria-free reverse genetics techniques are crucial for the efficient generation of recombinant viruses, bypassing the need for labor-intensive bacterial cloning. These methods are particularly relevant for studying the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19. This study compared the efficiency of three bacteria-free approaches-circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) with and without nick sealing and infectious sub-genomic amplicons (ISA)-to bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based technology for rescuing SARS-CoV-2. Significant differences in viral titers following transfection were observed between methods. CPER with nick sealing generated virus titers comparable to those of the BAC-based method and 10 times higher than those of the standard CPER. In contrast, ISA demonstrated extremely low efficiency, as cytopathic effects were detected only after two passages. All rescued viruses exhibited replication kinetics consistent with those of the original strain, with no significant deviation in replication capacity. Furthermore, the utility of CPER and ISA in genetically modifying SARS-CoV-2 was demonstrated by successfully inserting the gene encoding green fluorescent protein into the genome. Overall, this study underscores the potential of bacteria-free methods, such as CPER and ISA, in advancing SARS-CoV-2 research while highlighting their significant differences in efficiency.

Indexed as

Reverse GeneticsSARS-CoV-2AnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCOVID-19Genome, ViralHumansTransfectionVero CellsVirus Replicationcircular polymerase extension reactioninfectious cloneinfectious sub-genomic ampliconsreverse geneticsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40044137
PMCPMC13577132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.