Observational studyIndian heart journal
Drug-coated balloon in patients with in-stent restenosis: A prospective observational study.
Observational study in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SirolimusWorld journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Sirolimus Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Coronary Revascularization: An Updated Meta-Analysis with GRADE Assessment.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2026Review
- Assessing paclitaxel-coatedWorld journal of cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) and sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).
methodsThis prospective, observational, single-centre pilot study enrolled 85 patients diagnosed with drug-eluting stent ISR. For all the eligible patients, various clinical baseline characteristics were collected, and angiography was performed to evaluate the lesion characteristics. After assessment, patients were treated with either PCB or SCB based on our center's time-based approach. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imagining was used to assess the pre- and post-procedural minimal stent area (MSA). All the patients were followed up and major adverse cardiovascular events were documented for patients in both the groups.
resultsOf total 85 patients with ISR, 32 underwent treatment with PCB and 53 with SCB. A significant difference was noted in the post procedural MSA in both the groups (p = 0.005) and the values were 7.01 ± 1.11 mm
conclusionBoth PCB and SCB are found to be effective and safe in treating in patients with drug-eluting stents-ISR. Also, the use of DCB with imaging techniques like IVUS enhances treatment outcomes and optimizes patient care in ISR treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.