ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Altered proportions of retinal cell types and distinct visual codes in rodents occupying divergent ecological niches.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The extreme diversity of retinal amacrine cells has deep evolutionary roots.Science advances · 2026Article
- The Extreme Diversity Of Retinal Amacrine Cells Has Deep Evolutionary Roots.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Microstructure and transcriptomics reveal rapid light-induced visual plasticity in the non-obligate cave dweller Oreolalax rhodostigmatus (Megophryidae, Anura).BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genetic tuning of retinal ganglion cell subtype identity to drive visual behavior.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Comparative transcriptomic insights into the evolution of vertebrate photoreceptor types.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vertebrate retinas share a basic blueprint comprising 5 neuronal classes arranged according to a common wiring diagram. Yet, vision is aligned with species differences in behavior and ecology, raising the question of how evolution acts on this circuit to adjust its computational characteristics. We address that problem by comparing the thalamic visual code and retinal cell composition in closely related species occupying different niches: Rhabdomys pumilio, which are day-active murid rodents, and nocturnal laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Using high-density electrophysiological recordings, we compare visual responses at both single-unit and population levels in the thalamus of these two species. We find that Rhabdomys achieves a higher spatiotemporal resolution visual code through the selective expansion of information channels characterized by non-linear spatiotemporal summation. Comparative analysis of single-cell transcriptomic atlases reveals that this difference originates with the increased relative abundance of retinal bipolar and ganglion cell types supporting OFF and ON-OFF responses. These findings demonstrate that evolution may drive changes in neural computation by adjusting the proportions of shared cell types rather than inventing new types and show the power of matching high-density physiological recordings with transcriptomic cell atlases to study evolution in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.