ArticleCell systems2025
How well do contextual protein encodings learn structure, function, and evolutionary context?
Article in Cell systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In proteins, the optimal residue at any position is determined by its structural, evolutionary, and functional contexts-much like how a word may be inferred from its context in language. We trained masked label prediction models to learn representations of amino acid residues in different contexts. We focus questions on evolution and structural flexibility and whether and how contextual encodings derived through pretraining and fine-tuning may improve representations for specialized contexts. Sequences sampled from our learned representations fold into template structure and reflect sequence variations seen in related proteins. For flexible proteins, sampled sequences traverse the full conformational space of the native sequence, suggesting that plasticity is encoded in the template structure. For protein-protein interfaces, generated sequences replicate wild-type binding energies across diverse interfaces and binding strengths in silico. For the antibody-antigen interface, fine-tuning recapitulate conserved sequence patterns, while pretraining on general contexts improves sequence recovery for the hypervariable H3 loop. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.