ArticleDigestive surgery2025
Empiric Antimicrobial Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Resection: The Most Commonly Used Antimicrobial Regimens in the Netherlands and an Antimicrobial Treatment Recommendation Based on a Single-Center Population.
Article in Digestive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe development of anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy is a severe complication, often leading to mediastinitis and systemic infections. Effective empiric antimicrobial therapy is crucial, but there is no consensus on the optimal regimen. This study aimed to document antimicrobial regimens used in the Netherlands and to evaluate culture results from AL after esophagectomy at our center.
methodsAn online questionnaire about the preferred antimicrobial treatment of AL after esophagectomy was sent to all upper gastrointestinal surgeons in the Netherlands. In addition, drain culture results from patients with AL after esophagectomy in our center were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsFrom 76 responses, 28 were included, representing 13 of the 15 esophagectomy-performing centers in the Netherlands. For treating AL after esophagectomy, respondents typically choose broad-spectrum regimens covering Gram-negative, Gram-positive, and anaerobic bacteria. The cultures of 57 patients were analyzed. Overall, 61% had positive cultures for yeast, 61% of patients for Enterobacterales, and 16% for Pseudomonas and other non-fermenters.
conclusionBased on the studied cultures, empiric antibiotics should cover Gram-positive, Gram-negative, anaerobe bacteria and Pseudomonas. We recommend the use of empiric amoxicillin/clavulanic acid with tobramycin for patients with AL after esophagectomy, which is now protocol in our center. The addition of antifungals remains debatable. Given the high incidence of yeast-positive cultures in the studied cohort, we recommend the addition of an echinocandin in clinically unstable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.