Trial reportThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Successful Integration of Community-Based Rapid Antigen Testing for COVID-19 and Malaria in Mali.
Trial report in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitigation of COVID-19 through onsite testing and education among formerly incarcerated individuals (the MOSAIC study): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Public health · 2026Trial
- Operational Research to Support Rapid Evidence-Based Responses to Outbreaks: Learnings from COVID-19.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Mali, access to health care facilities (HCFs) is limited due to distance and transportation costs, and this limitation may have led to an under detection of COVID-19 cases. This prospective randomized study compared a community-based, integrated COVID-19 and malaria testing strategy (intervention arm) to the national standard-of-care strategy (SOC arm). Four health areas were randomly assigned. All people seeking care who accepted the study were enrolled by community health workers (CHWs) and screened for COVID-19 symptoms. In the intervention arm, CHWs performed COVID-19 and/or malaria antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for patients who met clinical criteria for possible COVID-19, including fever. In the SOC arm, CHWs referred patients who met clinical criteria for possible COVID-19, including fever, to the nearest health care facility (HCF) where COVID-19 and/or malaria Ag-RDTs were performed. Febrile patients refusing referral were tested for malaria by CHWs. Among 1,164 patients enrolled, 73% had fever and 72% meet clinical criteria for possible COVID-19. Malaria Ag-RDTs were performed in 79% and 3% COVID-19 suspected patients in intervention and SOC arms, respectively (P <0.001). Only three patients tested positive for COVID-19. Among 449 patients referred to HCFs, 248 refused to go to the HCFs, and only 10 of 201 who agreed to the referral actually reached one. Among febrile patients, 75% and 34% received malaria treatment in intervention and SOC arms, respectively (P <0.001). Integration of community-based testing for COVID-19 and malaria Ag-RDTs was found to be feasible. However, limited access to HCFs in rural areas highlights the need for treatment services to be available at the community level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.