ArticlePain2025
Factors influencing the hypoalgesic effects of virtual reality.
Article in Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Virtual Reality Interventions for Stress Reduction in the General Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials of extended reality for pain.Pain reports · 2026Article
- Effects of early life adversity on socially learned analgesia and empathy in virtual reality.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A critical role of affective content in the analgesic effect of virtual reality: a cross-sectional within-subject study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Effects of childhood adversity on socially learned placebo analgesia in virtual reality: A cross-sectional study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractVirtual reality (VR) is a promising intervention for both experimentally induced and clinical pain, but the factors contributing to the efficacy of VR remain relatively unclear, partially because selecting adequate controls in existing VR studies is challenging. Here, we identified and isolated several factors potentially influencing the hypoalgesic effect of VR. In this within-subjects, counterbalanced controlled study, healthy participants received painful heat stimulation under 5 conditions: VR Ocean (immersive ocean environment), Sham VR Ocean (nonimmersive ocean environment), VR Neutral (immersive neutral environment), Imagination (self-imagined ocean environment), and No-intervention. Participants underwent a pain tolerance test under each condition, stopping the heat stimulation when they reached their maximum tolerance. Participants were also divided into a group with information highlighting the VR Ocean as a highly effective intervention, and a control group receiving no such information. Results showed that pain tolerance, expressed in degree Celsius, was significantly higher in the VR Ocean condition compared with all other conditions, despite VR Ocean not attenuating self-reported pain intensity and disengagement from pain. In addition, VR Ocean decreased pain unpleasantness relative to all conditions except Sham VR Ocean. Virtual reality Ocean also improved mood relative to all other conditions and was perceived as the most engaging. Expectations did not affect the results. Taken together, we found that being immersed in an externally generated pleasant environment is key to the hypoalgesic effect of VR. Virtual reality is effective in increasing the level of pain being tolerated and mitigating the subjective affective experience of pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.