ArticlePLOS global public health2025
"…pretty much all white, and most of them are psychiatrists and men": Mixed-methods analysis of influence and challenges in global mental health.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the impact of safety guardrails on large language models using irritability metrics.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Reflections on Institutional Corruption in Mental Health Policy Implementation: Global Insights and the Eastern European Experience.Health and human rights · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health is increasingly recognised as a global health priority, with 'global mental health' gaining relevance as a field. We thus aimed to identify the most influential actors in global mental health and key challenges in the design and implementation of policies and interventions within this relatively nascent field, to provide suggestions on how mental health could be promoted and diversified at the global level to improve mental health outcomes. We conducted a mixed-methods study, incorporating a social network analysis of 115 experts to identify the most influential mental health actors and elements globally and 30 semi-structured key informant interviews, analysed thematically, to examine key challenges in developing the field. We found concentrated influence among a few actors, with network analysis highlighting psychiatry followed by psychology as most influential specialties, and academia as the most influential sector; limited global collaboration and political engagement; and the need for greater professional, socio-cultural, geographical, and gender diversity. Sustaining mental health prioritisation globally requires directed and coordinated efforts from influential individual and institutional actors in the global mental health field. This requires critical engagement with dominant modes of knowledge production, greater synergy at global, national, and community levels, and agenda setting by a broader and more equitable coalition of global mental health actors across professional, cultural, and gender differences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.