ArticlePloS one2025
Deaf children with cochlear implants in Chile: A national analysis of health determinants and outcomes in the Latin American context.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deafness from birth represents a critical challenge for children's communication, with substantial public health considerations. One intervention has been cochlear implants (CI) for children with severe to profound deafness. Since 2008, Chile has implemented regulations to provide a CI at an early age. However, wide variability exists in factors and expected outcomes without previous national studies. This study aimed to characterise deaf children with CI in Chile and evaluate the impact of CI on speech perception and production, social inclusion, and parental satisfaction. We conducted a prospective study using hospital clinical records and an online questionnaire with 107 deaf children under 15 who had received CIs from 2017 to 2019. We characterised factors and outcomes and investigated the relationship between demographic, audiological, and social determinants of health and outcomes, including communication at home, CAPII, SIR, Geers and Moog Scale, Social Inclusion, and Parental Satisfaction. Our study showed a national profile of deaf children with CI, representing 70% of those implanted from 2017 to 2019. CI beneficiaries lived in more developed boroughs (.54) compared to the national average (.37). Communication and speech perception outcomes varied and were concerning, yet more positive outcomes were presented for social inclusion and parental satisfaction. We found an association between the measured outcomes and children's age, a socio-economic factor, CI use and CI training. This novel national study supports integrating public services close to each beneficiary's borough to improve outcomes with the device. CI use and parental training might be crucial measures during rehabilitation treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.