ArticlePloS one2025
Optimizing nitrogen removal with an immobilized biological filler system: realizing stage-independent operational process.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the operation mode of traditional activated sludge systems, it is difficult for various functional bacteria to exert their respective advantages. In this study, immobilized fillers for hydrolytic acidification, nitrification, and denitrification were developed to allow independent operation at each stage, enhancing nitrogen removal performance of overall process. The results showed that ammonia nitrogen and total nitrogen levels in the effluent stabilized at 0.75-0.83 and 1.5-2 mg/L, respectively, when the total hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the system was 6.4 h and the nitrification unit HRT was 3 h. These values represented significant improvements compared with the traditional activated sludge process. Unit performance tests revealed that reducing the hydrolytic-acidification time to 0 min increased nitrite nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen levels in the effluent of unit A2 to 6.11 ± 0.2 mg/L and 3.67 ± 0.1 mg/L, respectively. This demonstrates that an active hydrolysis - acidification stage is the prerequisite for A2 to fully utilize raw organic matter in the water for remove nitrogen. When raw organic matter in the water bypassed the A2 unit and entered the O1 unit directly, ammonia oxidation rate (AOR) significantly decreased (from 0.32-0.33 to 0.22-0.23 kg/m3 ⋅ d), with further reduction at a low temperature (down to 0.11-0.12 kg/m3 ⋅ d). At this time, the AOR, unaffected by organic matter, decreased only slightly. This indicates that directing organic matter into the nitrification stage is essential for maintaining stability and resisting low temperatures. This process has certain guiding significance for improving nitrogen removal efficiency in municipal wastewater processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.