ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Effects of black soldier fly larvae on the fecal characteristics, skin and coat health markers, immune function, and oral health measures of healthy adult cats.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) is a recently approved alternative protein source for dog and cat foods and treats in the United States, but research in cats remains limited. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of BSFL on the serum chemistry, hematology, skin and coat health markers, fecal characteristics, immune function, and oral health measures of healthy adult cats. Twenty-five adult cats (17 females and 8 males; 6.28 ± 0.27 yr; 4.50 ± 0.18 kg) were used in a completely randomized design. The study was composed of a 21-d baseline period and a 70-d experimental period. During the baseline period, all cats were fed a chicken meal-based control diet (35% of diet). After baseline, cats were assigned to 1 of 2 experimental diets: control diet (n = 12) or a BSFL-containing diet (20% whole BSFL meal and 24% chicken meal; n = 13). At baseline, teeth were cleaned by a veterinarian. Breath samples were analyzed for odor components, salivary pH was measured, and blood samples were collected after baseline cleaning, day 35, and day 70. Feces were scored, fecal samples were collected, skin was assessed, and hair was collected at baseline and day 70. Oral health indicators were assessed by a board-certified veterinarian at day 70. Data were analyzed using the mixed models procedure of SAS, testing for effects of diet (oral microbiota) or diet, time, and diet*time (variables measured over time), with P < 0.05 being significant. Diet*time interactions (P < 0.05) were noted for blood calcium, cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations and fecal characteristics, metabolite concentrations, and microbiota populations. Some hematologic measures were affected by time, but none were impacted by diet. Cats fed BSFL had lower (P < 0.05) fecal pH, dry matter, and phenol, indole, and branched-chain fatty acid concentrations, and greater (P < 0.05) fecal scores and short-chain fatty acid concentrations. Fecal microbiota populations were affected by BSFL, with alpha diversity, beta diversity, and >20 bacterial genera being different between groups. Immune markers, skin and hair measures, salivary pH, breath odor, and oral microbiota and health measures were unaffected by the diet. In conclusion, a 20% dietary BSFL inclusion had clear effects on the fecal characteristics, metabolites, and microbiota of healthy adult cats, shifting most outcomes in a positive direction. Inclusion of BSFL had mild effects on serum metabolites and did not significantly affect the other variables measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.