ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2025
Spatio-temporal dynamics of bacterial community composition in a Western European watershed, the Meuse River watershed.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Elbe Estuary Microbiome Shifts With Salinity and Discharge and Depends on Fresh Organic Matter and Nutrient Availability.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
- Seasonal Dynamics of Freshwater Bacterial Communities in Continental and Mediterranean Lakes.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify factors influencing bacterial diversity in the Meuse River watershed by analyzing 42 locations sampled in spring and summer 2019, combined with biweekly sampling of one mid-stream location for a year. Bacterial community composition (BCC) was assessed in the small (SF; <5 µm) and large fractions (LF; ≥5 µm,), alongside physico-chemical parameters. LF consistently exhibited greater alpha diversity than SF. During the spatial campaigns, alpha diversity increased downstream in spring with high discharge, and BCC differed significantly between headwaters and the main river. Along this axis, several genera, Flavobacterium, Limnohabitans, and Aquirufa stood out as indicators of good water quality. Rhodoferax, another taxon indicative of good water quality, prevailed in the headwaters and during winter. In contrast, two cyanobacteria genera indicators of poor river quality, Microcystis PCC 7914 and Cyanobium PCC 6307, peaked in summer. BCC in spring and summer temporal samples aligned with spatial ones, while winter and autumn samples had distinct BCC. Finally, season, temperature, and distance from river mouth were the main driving parameters of beta diversity, outweighing the effect of fraction size on the BCC. These findings reinforce the notion that local conditions exert significant influence on bacterial communities in rivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.