ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025
Biomechanics of Meniscus Tears and Repair Techniques.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- What does a failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction really mean? An integrative view.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
- Optimizing Anatomic Reduction of Vertical Meniscus Tears With All-Inside Meniscus Repair.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Complications and Reoperations Following Meniscal Repair and Transplantation.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Finite element analysis of medial meniscus tears and related surgical techniques with biomechanical validation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic Medial Meniscus Allograft Transplant With Re-tensionable Suture Anchor Fixation and Centralization Stabilization Suture.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Medial meniscus root tears: mechanics, management, and techniques.Annals of joint · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTreatment of meniscus injuries can have a substantial effect on the intra-articular biomechanics and long-term function of the knee. Meniscus repair has become a more favorable treatment option as prior studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between meniscal preservation and restoration of intra-articular contact pressure and decreased progression of arthritis. The goal of meniscus repair is to provide a stable load bearing construct to allow for meniscal healing. Repair constructs vary by tear pattern, tear location, and repair technique. The purpose of this review is to highlight the biomechanical strength of meniscus repair techniques for frequently encountered meniscus tears. RECENT
findingsRecent literature reports that meniscus tear type and location influence which repair technique would provide the most stable construct. Prior studies report that inside-out meniscus repair is the gold standard for longitudinal tears, but more recent literature on modern all-inside repair devices suggest improvements with all-inside devices. Radial tears repaired with vertical mattress rip stop sutures added to horizontal mattress repair sutures have less suture cut-out and improved stability. Root tears repaired with a locking suture configuration result in biomechanical strength similar to a native meniscus and addition of a centralization suture may further improve this construct. No single repair technique is superior to others across meniscus repair types. Surgeons need to thoroughly understand various tear patterns and be familiar with a variety of repair techniques in order to provide the most stable construct for meniscus repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.