ArticlePituitary2025
Identifying research priorities for pituitary adenoma surgery: an international Delphi consensus statement.
Article in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in pituitary surgery: the path to clinical solutions.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Article
- Intranasal povidone-iodine concentration and olfactory recovery after endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery.Pituitary · 2026Article
- The impact of a non-functioning pituitary adenoma on life - A qualitative study of patients' experiences.PloS one · 2026Article
- Two-stage surgery for cystic craniopharyngiomas: a purely endoscopic strategy and outcomes.Pituitary · 2025Article
- Endoscopic endonasal resection of giant pituitary adenomas - case series from the referral pituitary center.Pituitary · 2025Article
- The feedback loop in pituitary surgery.Pituitary · 2025Article
- A core outcome set for pituitary surgery research: an international delphi consensus study.Pituitary · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePituitary surgery is the mainstay treatment for most pituitary adenomas, but many questions remain about perioperative and long-term management and outcomes. This study aimed to identify the most pressing research priorities in pituitary surgery with input from patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.
methodsAn initial survey of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals assembled priorities related to preoperative care, surgical techniques, and postoperative management in pituitary surgery. Priorities were thematically grouped into summary priorities, and those answered by existing evidence were omitted following a literature review. An interim survey asked patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals to select their top 10 priorities from the remaining list. The highest-ranked priorities advanced to a consensus meeting, where the top 10 questions were prioritized.
resultsIn the initial survey, 147 participants-60.5% of whom were patients, caregivers, or patient support group representatives-submitted 785 priorities, which were then condensed into 52 summary priorities. After a literature review, 33 unanswered priorities were included in the interim survey, completed by 155 respondents, of whom 54.2% were patients, caregivers, or patient support group representatives. The top-ranked priorities were discussed by 14 participants (7 patients and 7 healthcare professionals) during a consensus meeting. The top 10 priorities covered a variety of themes including enhancing diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas, advancing surgical techniques and technologies, optimizing the prediction of outcomes and complications, and improving patient support and follow-up.
conclusionsThe top 10 research priorities in pituitary surgery aim to align researchers and direct funding in order to maximize impact and champion patient representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.