ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Unveiling the complexities of catheter-related thrombosis: risk factors, preventive strategies, and management.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for Catheter-Related Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Knot formation of a pulmonary artery catheter associated with right internal jugular vein thrombosis: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Catheter-related deep venous thrombosis (CR-DVT) is a common complication of central venous catheters, however optimal prophylactic and treatment strategies have yet to be fully defined. While the use of anticoagulation for CR-DVT prophylaxis is not routinely recommended, current available data offer heterogeneous results due to small sample size, non-uniform study design, and varying comorbid conditions. Available guidelines for the treatment of CR-DVT generally recommend a limited duration of anticoagulation after catheter removal. If ongoing use is required and the device remains functional, guidelines support anticoagulation throughout the time the catheter remains in place. It is worth acknowledging that data guiding these recommendations is largely derived from observational studies of upper extremity CR-DVT, along with randomized trials of anticoagulation in patients with lower extremity DVT. Therefore, large, randomized controlled trials are desperately needed to define optimal management, especially in patients who are at high risk for bleeding. This review explores the epidemiology and risk factors of CR-DVT, diagnostic, prophylactic and treatment strategies, guideline recommendations, and future advances in the field, including the introduction of novel anticoagulants. With current available evidence, we also conclude with an individualized approach to preventing and managing CR-DVT to assist clinicians who are faced with this common clinical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.