Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40042714›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2025

Current clinical trials for craniopharyngiomas: what's on the horizon?

Nikhil Joshi, Sabine Mueller, Cassie Kline

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nikhil JoshiDivision of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Sabine MuellerDepartments of Neurology, Neurological Surgery, and Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. Sabine.Mueller@ucsf.edu.
Cassie KlineDivision of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniopharyngiomas are histologically low-grade tumors in the sellar/suprasellar region that grow close to critical structures including the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and optic chiasm. Due to this challenging location, many patients face long-term complications including neuroendocrine, neurologic, and visual deficits. As a result, there is interest in developing risk-optimized treatments that minimize damage to adjacent normal tissue and limit chronic complications patients face. In recent years, numerous multi-omic characterizations of craniopharyngioma have identified potential targetable markers of craniopharyngioma. In adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma, numerous clinical trials to explore MEK, PD-1, WNT, and IL-6 inhibition are currently active. In papillary craniopharyngioma, targeting BRAF-V600E and MEK with monotherapy and combined therapies are currently being investigated. Further combining of these therapies with radiation and surgical techniques have potential to change existing treatment paradigms and improve the long-term outcome for patients with craniopharyngioma. With our advanced understanding, clinical investigations that target identified oncogenic drivers of craniopharyngioma should continue to center on therapy options that minimize complications faced by patients with this chronic, high morbidity disease.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCraniopharyngiomaPituitary NeoplasmsHumansBRAFV600EClinical trialsCraniopharygniomaIL-6MEK/ERKPD-1

Identifiers

PMID40042714
PMCPMC11937174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.