ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Impact of pregnancy on the treatment and outcomes of glioma: a cohort study.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awake craniotomy with functional mapping for recurrent high-grade IDH-mutant glioma during pregnancy: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in patients treated for glioma before or during pregnancy: a single-institution retrospective series.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPregnancy's impact on cancer has been understudied throughout the literature. The current authoritative cancer database in the US, NCI's SEER database, tracks nearly all aspects of cancer care however has no provision to track pregnancy. Consequently, there are no systematic evidence based clinical guidelines available for this vulnerable population.
objectiveThis retrospective cohort study outlines reported clinical presentation, obstetric outcomes, and treatment regimens for pregnant patients diagnosed with glioma to better understand current practice pattern for glioma during pregnancy. EVIDENCE REVIEW: An exhaustive PubMed and Cochrane based literature search was performed for pregnancy and glioma. Individual patient data was extracted primarily from case reports and case series, since pregnancy is an exclusion criterion for most clinical trials.
findingsWe identified a cohort of 94 patients, 54% of whom (n = 51/94) were diagnosed prior to their pregnancy. Of the patients who were diagnosed during their pregnancy, diagnosis was most common in the second trimester (27%, n = 25/94). Seizure was the most common presenting symptom and maternal survival varied significantly by glioma grade. Treatment delays were common and were most detrimental to maternal survival in glioblastoma (GBM) (22 months (no delay) vs 8 months (delay) p < 0.10). Most patients regardless of tumor grade delivered healthy babies (80%, n = 75/94) while GBM carried the highest rate of birth complications or defects (15% n = 3/20). Fetal exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy increased the rate of birth defects or complications from 5% (n = 2/47) to 16% (n = 6/37). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In summary, we found wide practice variation in management of glioma during pregnancy. Systematic reporting on this vulnerable population is needed to better serve mothers and fetuses during this incredibly challenging life event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40042713What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.