Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40042696›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2025

Advances in magnetic affinity-based isolation/detection of exosomes for robust diagnostics.

Veronika Solovicová, Anna Ďatková, Tomáš Bertók, Peter Kasák, Alica Vikartovská, Lenka Lorencová, Jan Tkac

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Extracellular vesicles isolation: a focus on magnetic beads-assisted platforms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Veronika SolovicováInstitute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 5807/9, 845 38, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Anna ĎatkováInstitute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 5807/9, 845 38, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Tomáš BertókInstitute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 5807/9, 845 38, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Peter KasákCenter for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Alica VikartovskáInstitute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 5807/9, 845 38, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Lenka LorencováInstitute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 5807/9, 845 38, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Jan TkacInstitute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 5807/9, 845 38, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. Jan.Tkac@savba.sk.ORCID 0000-0002-0765-7262

Funding

Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja APVV-22-0345, APVV-20-0272 and APVV-21-0329Qatar University and Institute of Chemistry? slovak Academy of Sciences IRCC-2024-429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The review article provides a short introduction to exosomes with the focus to use exosomes as disease markers itself (i.e. their concentration or presence of some specific receptors) or a source of disease biomarkers such as proteins and metabolites. In detail, we are discussing various methods of exosome isolation and the main focus of the review paper is on affinity capture of exosomes, since some of them can be applied to the isolation of specific sub-populations of exosomes produced by some specific organs. The article provides a comprehensive overview of magnetic (bio)affinity capture applied to the detection of exosomes or exosomal cargo using different (bio)affinity capture ligands such as antibodies, DNA aptamers, peptides, glycan-based recognition, transferrin-based approaches, affinity based on recognition of phospholipids of exosomes and other approaches including electrostatic interactions. The review in detail provides key analytical and clinical parameters of such approaches in a form of an extensive table summarising outcomes published in the last two years (2023-2024). Finally, the review paper also provides conclusions sections discussing pros and cons of magnetic (bio)affinity capture for exosome isolation and/or determination  of exosomal content.

Indexed as

ExosomesAptamers, NucleotideBiomarkersHumansMagnetic PhenomenaAptamers, NucleotideBiomarkersAffinity captureBiomarker discoveryCancer diagnosticsExosomesMagnetic beads

Identifiers

PMID40042696
PMCPMC11882713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.