Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40042655›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Postmortem diagnostics in sudden unexpected death in infants and children: use and utility.

A M Pries, A C van der Gugten, H A Moll, W M Klein, PESUDIC Collaborative, J Fuijkschot, P J Puiman

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A M PriesDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. a.pries@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3865-0441
A C van der GugtenDepartment of Paediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
H A MollDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
W M KleinDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
PESUDIC Collaborative
J FuijkschotDepartment of Paediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
P J PuimanDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden unexpected death in infants (SUDI) and children (SUDC) requires thorough investigation to identify causes and prevention strategies. In the Netherlands, these deaths are investigated using the standardized postmortem evaluation of sudden unexpected death in infants and children (PESUDIC) procedure. This study examines the use of various diagnostic tests within PESUDIC and their effectiveness in determining causes of death. This observational study included infants and children who died suddenly and underwent the PESUDIC procedure from 2016 to 2022. Standardized data on medical history, postmortem examinations, and diagnostic outcomes were collected. Findings were classified by consensus of two experts as "contributory" if they supported the cause of death and "decisive" if they were leading for determination. A total of 275 cases were included. Median age was 13 months (IQR 3.5-73.3). Fifty-nine percent were boys. Over 95% of cases had a medical history, postmortem physical examination, biochemical, and microbiological testing available. Total body postmortem CT and/or MRI was done in 93% (n = 255) and autopsy in 62% (n = 171). The cause of death was determined in 193 (70%). History, imaging, and autopsy provided contributory results in 50% (n = 137/275), 40% (n = 103/255), and 67% (n = 115/171) of applicable cases, respectively. More than two different tests showed contributory findings in 52% of diagnosed cases. Autopsy and microbiological testing had decisive findings most often: in 83/171 and 44/265 cases respectively.

conclusionA routinely performed wide array of postmortem investigations has additional value to an autopsy for identifying the cause of death in SUDI and SUDC. A thorough SUDY investigation should therefore minimally include an autopsy, microbiological testing, and whole-body imaging. WHAT IS KNOWN: • A thorough postmortem investigation into the cause of sudden death in infants and children can provide an explanation of the death and identify potential preventable causes. WHAT IS NEW: • A thorough postmortem investigation for sudden unexpected death in infants and children should minimally include an autopsy, microbiological testing and whole-body imaging.

Indexed as

Death, SuddenSudden Infant DeathAutopsyCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNetherlandsChild death reviewForensicSDYSIDSSUDCSUDI

Identifiers

PMID40042655
PMCPMC11882728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.