ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Factors Predicting Early Outcome of Aortic Valve Neocuspidization in the Pediatric Population.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic valve reconstruction in the pediatric population presents significant surgical challenges as the ideal repair requires an individualized approach considering various factors. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing outcomes of aortic valve neocuspidization (AV Neo) in pediatric patients. A retrospective cohort study involving pediatric patients who underwent neocuspidization (congenital and acquired) between 2016 and 2023. Clinical outcomes assessed included mortality, reintervention, structural valve degeneration and infective endocarditis. Echocardiographic measurements included peak and mean gradient, indexed vena contracta jet width, annular diameter, and coaptation height. Freedom from events was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Outcomes were compared based on congenital or acquired valve lesions. AV neo was performed in 53 patients with a mean age of 10.7 ± 3.91 years, of which 29 had congenital aortic valve disease. There was one early in-hospital mortality. At discharge, the mean coaptation height was 9.9 ± 1.0 mm, the peak gradient was 12.0 mmHg, and less than mild regurgitation was observed. The median follow up period was 27.4 months. Forty-four patients (83%) remained event-free. A Significant aortic annular growth was noted, with rheumatic etiology patients showed the most stable coaptation height over time. Truncus arteriosus patients demonstrated rapid growth of the annulus leading to accelerated truncal valve regurgitation progression. AV Neo is feasible with acceptable short-term results in pediatric patients with congenital and acquired etiology. The procedure allows significant physiological annular growth, particularly benefiting patients with rheumatic aortic valve disease, but less favorable among patients with truncal valve pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.