ArticleNeurosurgery2025
Dynamic Tumor in Situ Fluid Circulating Tumor DNA Postsurgery Effectively Predicts Recurrence and Clinical Benefits for Glioblastomas.
Article in Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Reshaping the immunosuppressive glioma microenvironment: mechanisms, biomarkers, and emerging immunotherapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesGlioblastoma (GBM) recurrence after surgery remains a significant clinical challenge because of limited early detection methods and effective molecular markers. This study investigates the potential of dynamic tumor in situ fluid circulating tumor DNA (TISF-ctDNA) as a tool for monitoring molecular residual disease and evaluating treatment efficacy in postsurgical patients with GBM.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, 75 resectable glioma patients were enrolled between October 2019 to June 2023. Primary tumor tissues and postsurgical TISF samples were collected, along with cranial imaging. TISF-ctDNA was identified through targeted next-generation sequencing, with positivity defined by the presence of one or more variants in the TISF matching those of the primary tumors or an increase of ≥10 single-nucleotide variants across consecutive assessments.
resultsTISF-ctDNA positivity was identified in 62.2% of patients in the early postsurgical period, indicating a high prevalence of molecular residual disease. Patients with positive TISF-ctDNA showed a significantly higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 2.512, 95% CI 1.264-4.993, P = .0054). Conversion to TISF-ctDNA negativity post-treatment was associated with improved overall survival, highlighting its role in evaluating treatment response. Multivariate analysis revealed that TISF-ctDNA positivity was an independent predictor of progression-free survival during adjuvant therapy, with high predictive accuracy (sensitivity 86.2%, specificity 100%). Importantly, TISF-ctDNA positivity preceded imaging signs of recurrence by a median of 71 days. In this study, no significant impact of specific tumor markers in each subcohort (EGFR, TP53, PTEN, NF1) on progression-free survival or overall survival was observed.
conclusionTISF-ctDNA is a promising biomarker for monitoring GBM recurrence and evaluating clinical benefit. It provides insight into tumor genomic evolution and identifies patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. TISF-ctDNA positivity is a robust prognostic indicator for patient outcomes and a marker for molecular recurrence after frontline therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.