ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
A high-throughput anaerobic method for viability assays.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Viability testing for anaerobes is a time-consuming and expensive process, posing challenges for research and public health settings. Here, we present a rapid, economical, and reliable method for testing anaerobe viability using the Geometric Viability Assay (GVA) with IMPORTANCE: The routine assessment for the viability of anaerobes is based on bacterial plating, but so far, it has been limited in throughput by the long preparation steps and the tedious anaerobic culturing. Thus, comparatively little is known about the susceptibility pattern, and the sporulation of anaerobes because of the absence of the proper method. Here, we show GVA can quantify the anaerobic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.