Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40042174›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2025

Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering-Where Do We Stand Today?

Florian Gisperg, Robert Klausser, Mohamed Elshazly, Julian Kopp, Eva Přáda Brichtová, Oliver Spadiut

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Guide to Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Enhanced l-serine synthesis inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Florian GispergChristian Doppler Laboratory for Inclusion Body Processing 4.0, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2002-0728
Robert KlausserChristian Doppler Laboratory for Inclusion Body Processing 4.0, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5360-6387
Mohamed ElshazlyChristian Doppler Laboratory for Inclusion Body Processing 4.0, Vienna, Austria.
Julian KoppChristian Doppler Laboratory for Inclusion Body Processing 4.0, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4975-7103
Eva Přáda BrichtováChristian Doppler Laboratory for Inclusion Body Processing 4.0, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9888-6185
Oliver SpadiutChristian Doppler Laboratory for Inclusion Body Processing 4.0, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0916-0644

Funding

This study was supported by Christian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian optimization is a stochastic, global black-box optimization algorithm. By combining Machine Learning with decision-making, the algorithm can optimally utilize information gained during experimentation to plan further experiments-while balancing exploration and exploitation. Although Design of Experiments has traditionally been the preferred method for optimizing bioprocesses, AI-driven tools have recently drawn increasing attention to Bayesian optimization within bioprocess engineering. This review presents the principles and methodologies of Bayesian optimization and focuses on its application to various stages of bioprocess engineering in upstream and downstream processing.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyAlgorithmsBayes TheoremMachine Learningactive learningBayesian optimizationbioprocess engineeringmachine learningmodel‐based optimization

Identifiers

PMID40042174
PMCPMC12067035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.