Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40042140›Full record

ArticleZoo biology

Radiological Landmarks as an Aid in the Interpretation of Rodent Skull Extra-Oral Projections.

Quintin Norval, Adrian Tordiffe, Gerhard Steenkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoo biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Quintin NorvalDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-3413
Adrian TordiffeDepartment of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-3153
Gerhard SteenkampDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8428-7309

Funding

This research was financed by the developmental fund from the Department of Companion Animal Clinical Studies and AgriSETA bursary (Grant BC24UP-18.1).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the radiographic anatomy of rodent skulls is essential for accurately interpreting extra-oral radiographs, a non-invasive diagnostic tool commonly used in veterinary practice. Due to the complexity of the skull and the potential for distortion in two-dimensional views, a systematic evaluation of anatomical structures is necessary. This study identifies the most clinically relevant anatomical landmarks on standard extra-oral radiographic views of the skull and mandible in various rodent species, including a cane rat, two woodchucks, and seven common mole rats. Specimens were evaluated with bone and soft tissue intact, as well as dried skulls, to identify key anatomical features. The findings highlight distinct species-specific variations despite general similarities in skull structure. These landmarks were catalogued to aid veterinary professionals in interpreting rodent radiographs. Improved recognition of these structures enhances diagnostic accuracy, enabling better assessment of normal anatomy and potential pathological conditions in rodent patients.

Indexed as

MandibleRadiographyRodentiaSkullAnimalsAnimals, ZooMole RatsSpecies Specificityincisors and cheek teethosteologyradiography

Identifiers

PMID40042140
PMCPMC12131694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.