ArticlePediatric pulmonology2025
"Evaluation of Different Inspiratory Efforts in a Pediatric Model of Healthy Lung and Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During Optimized Pressure Support Ventilation and Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus (PAV+): A Bench Study.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06998927 (Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus and Estimation of Respiratory Effort in Critically Ill Patients During the Transition to Spontaneous Ventilation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus and Estimation of Respiratory Effort in Critically Ill Patients During the Transition to Spontaneous Ventilation: A Prospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWhile proportional ventilator modes have gained popularity in adult patients' ventilatory management, Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV+) use in pediatric patients with Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PARDS) remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effects of optimized PSV and PAV+ on patient-ventilator interaction and respiratory pattern in two pediatric simulated lung models.
methodsThe study utilized an active lung simulator to replicate two pediatric lung models: one healthy and one with mild PARDS. Each model was ventilated using PAV+ and optimized PSV at four different levels, assessing simulated patient-ventilator interaction and mechanical response to increase inspiratory effort.
resultsIn terms of simulated patient-ventilator interaction, in a healthy and mild PARDS lung model and all setting tested, the optimized PSV presented the better patient-ventilator interaction with the shortest values of Inspiratory trigger delay (Delay
conclusionsIn a healthy lung model, optimized PSV allows optimal simulated patient-ventilator interaction and assistance levels compared to PAV+. On the contrary, in a simulated lung with mild PARDS, PAV+ appears as a valid alternative to PSV, especially under conditions of intense inspiratory effort and high assistance levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.