Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40042128›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

The Evolution of Locally Adaptive Chromosome Inversions in Mimulus guttatus.

Leslie M Kollar, Lauren E Stanley, Sunil K Kenchanmane Raju, David B Lowry, Chad E Niederhuth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leslie M KollarDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8726-9085
Lauren E StanleyDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Sunil K Kenchanmane RajuDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
David B LowryDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8182-1059
Chad E NiederhuthDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2010769National Science Foundation 2109560National Science Foundation IOS-1855927National Science Foundation IOS-2153100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms are ubiquitous across the diversity of diploid organisms and play a significant role in the evolution of adaptations in those species. Inversions are thought to operate as supergenes by trapping adaptive alleles at multiple linked loci through the suppression of recombination. While there is now considerable support for the supergene mechanism of inversion evolution, the extent to which inversions trap pre-existing adaptive genetic variation versus accumulate new adaptive variants over time remains unclear. In this study, we report new insights into the evolution of a locally adaptive chromosomal inversion polymorphism (inv_chr8A), which contributes to the adaptive divergence between coastal perennial and inland annual ecotypes of the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. This research was enabled by the sequencing, assembly and annotation of new annual and perennial genomes of M. guttatus using Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing technology. In addition to the adaptive inv_chr8A inversion, we identified three other large inversion polymorphisms, including a previously unknown large inversion (inv_chr8B) nested within inv_chr8A. Through population genomic analyses, we determined that the nested inv_chr8B inversion is significantly older than the larger chromosomal inversion in which it resides. We also evaluated the potential role of key candidate genes underlying the phenotypic effects of inv_chr8A. These genes are involved in gibberellin biosynthesis and anthocyanin regulation. Although little evidence was found to suggest that inversion breakpoint mutations drive adaptive phenotypic effects, our findings do support the supergene mechanism of adaptation and suggest it may sometimes involve nested inversions that evolve at different times.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalChromosome InversionEvolution, MolecularMimulusChromosomes, PlantGenetics, PopulationGenome, PlantPolymorphism, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID40042128
PMCPMC12530288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.