Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041971›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2024

Towards an inclusive and culturally sensitive conceptualisation of sexual well-being of young people: preliminary framework development using a modified Delphi methodology.

Lore Remmerie, Guncha Annageldiyeva, Kayleigh Grossman, Caesar Kaba Kogoziga, Nicole Leonetti, Ana Mosiashvili, Shreya Shrestha, Tisungane Sitima, Evi Stuckens, Michael Tetteh Doku and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lore RemmeriePhD Researcher, Institute for Family and Sexuality Studies, Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0008-2504-8226
Guncha AnnageldiyevaY-PEER International Coordinator, Y-PEER International Network, Ashgabat, Turkmenistan.
Kayleigh GrossmanMasters by Research Candidate, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Caesar Kaba KogozigaProgrammes Coordinator, Planned Parenthood Association of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Nicole LeonettiYouth Advocate, CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ana MosiashviliSecretary-General, European Confederation of Youth Clubs, Brussels, Belgium.
Shreya ShresthaStudent, Erasmus+ Scholar Women and Gender Studies (GEMMA); University of lodz/ Utrecht University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tisungane SitimaYouth worker, Foundation for Rural Development, Blantyre, Malawi.
Evi StuckensVolunteer, Sensoa VZW, Antwerp, Belgium.
Michael Tetteh DokuAdvocacy and Communications Manager, Curious Minds Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Aslan TemirkhanovIndependent Researcher, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Diana Marcela ZambranoIndependent Researcher, Research Department, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Heidi MertesAssociate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences and Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Kristien MichielsenAssociate Professor, Institute for Family and Sexuality Studies, Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to contribute to the development of a comprehensive framework for sexual well-being of young people. By making space for diverse young people's perspectives through co-creating the framework, we seek to enhance the understanding of sexual well-being in sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) research in a culturally sensitive and inclusive way. A modified Delphi study invited SRHR young professionals (aged 18-30) with different backgrounds to participate as experts in three rounds of online discussions. A framework of sexual well-being was co-created by 15 young professionals from countries across Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America. This framework recognised sexual well-being as a subjective concept with different meanings: for example, by applying an open understanding of sexual activity, and intimacy. It also acknowledged the challenges individuals face in fully understanding and achieving their sexual well-being, due to societal injustices. The framework outlined key capabilities inherent to sexual well-being, including informed decision-making, bodily autonomy, consent, exploration, self-awareness, pleasure, communication, comfort, safety, and self-esteem. Considering that these capabilities can only be realised within an enabling environment, access to sexual health information and services, as well as acceptance, respect, safety, and freedom from coercion and violence, were included as a key part of the framework. This study captured young people's views on sexual well-being to co-create a culturally sensitive framework. This framework recognises different interpretations of sexual well-being, and focuses on supportive environments that empower individuals to define and pursue sexual well-being in a way that honours their experiences and needs.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyReproductive HealthSexual BehaviorSexual HealthAdolescentAdultDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDelphi methodparticipatory researchpositive approachsexual well-beingSRHRyouth

Identifiers

PMID40041971
PMCPMC11983578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.