ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Patient-reported outcome measures to deliver patient and family-centered care in pediatrics: the ball is now in our court.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Qualitative insights from patient/caregivers, and clinicians on routine use of the EQ-5D-Y-5L in clinical paediatric care-results from a pilot feasibility and acceptability trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- Translating scores into meaning: a co-produced forum for patient-reported outcome measure interpretation in pediatric congenital heart disease.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Bridging clinical care and lived experience: early implementation of longitudinal health-related quality of life monitoring in congenital heart disease.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures into routine paediatric pharmacovigilance: opportunities for safety monitoring with practical use scenarios from paediatric oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are self-reported questionnaires that are used to deliver patient and family-centered care, but their use in routine pediatric clinical care remains limited. The American Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends patient-centered care to achieve high quality health care delivery and PROMs can be used in routine pediatric clinical care to support six critical dimensions of patient-centered care endorsed by the IOM. The growing evidence including our systematic review of pediatric PROMs, shows that incorporating PROMs into routine pediatric clinical practice significantly enhances the quality of care and has a positive impact on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) among children and youth. Thus, we are sharing our perspectives on the current evidence, emphasizing the need for using PROMs in routine pediatric clinical care and proposing strategies for pediatric implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.