Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041851›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2025

Unraveling the complexity of rat object vision requires a full convolutional network and beyond.

Paolo Muratore, Alireza Alemi, Davide Zoccolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paolo MuratoreVisual Neuroscience Lab, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), 34136 Trieste, Italy.
Alireza AlemiCenter for Neuroscience, and Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Davide ZoccolanVisual Neuroscience Lab, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), 34136 Trieste, Italy.

Funding

Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Learned Changes in Persistent Neural ActivityR01NS104926 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI AKSAY, EMRE R, GOLDMAN, MARK S · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their prominence as model systems of visual functions, it remains unclear whether rodents are capable of truly advanced processing of visual information. Here, we used a convolutional neural network (CNN) to measure the computational complexity required to account for rat object vision. We found that rat ability to discriminate objects despite scaling, translation, and rotation was well accounted for by the CNN mid-level layers. However, the tolerance displayed by rats to more severe image manipulations (occlusion and reduction of objects to outlines) was achieved by the network only in the final layers. Moreover, rats deployed perceptual strategies that were more invariant than those of the CNN, as they more consistently relied on the same set of diagnostic features across transformations. These results reveal an unexpected level of sophistication of rat object vision, while reinforcing the intuition that CNNs learn solutions that only marginally match those of biological visual systems.

Indexed as

artificial vs. biological visionconvolutional neural networksinvarianceobject recognitionperceptual strategyrodentsvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID40041851
PMCPMC11873012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.