ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
The Perineal Post for Hip Arthroscopy Is Dead-Or at Least It Should Be.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Trends in the Use of Postless Hip Arthroscopy: An Updated Survey of the ISHA Membership.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditionally, distraction of the hip joint during hip arthroscopy has been achieved with the use of a perineal post, which acts as a counterforce. However, our knowledge of the potential complications related to the use of a perineal post continues to grow. Although pudendal neurapraxia is the most common of these potential complications, the perineal post also may cause skin tears of the perineum, erectile dysfunction and, in rare cases, permanent pudendal nerve injury. In response, several techniques for performing postless hip arthroscopy have been developed in recent years. Although some of these techniques are commercially available and some are "do-it-yourself," preliminary evidence has shown minimal risk of groin-related complications with these postless techniques. In addition to reducing complication rates, our research revealed significantly better patient-reported outcomes with postless compared with post-assisted hip arthroscopy at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Groin-related complications during hip arthroscopy are confusing and anxiety-producing to patients. Hip arthroscopy is an elective procedure, and patients do not expect to have any groin symptoms after a hip surgery. Because this is a sensitive issue, the potential for groin-related complications is rarely discussed with patients preoperatively. In addition, patients often are confused and reluctant to mention groin-related complications to their surgeon, especially if these symptoms are short-lived. Postless hip arthroscopy is a readily accessible, safe alternative to using a perineal post and should be adopted as the standard of care sooner rather than later.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.