Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041844›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025

The Perineal Post for Hip Arthroscopy Is Dead-Or at Least It Should Be.

Matthew J Kraeutler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthew J KraeutlerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, distraction of the hip joint during hip arthroscopy has been achieved with the use of a perineal post, which acts as a counterforce. However, our knowledge of the potential complications related to the use of a perineal post continues to grow. Although pudendal neurapraxia is the most common of these potential complications, the perineal post also may cause skin tears of the perineum, erectile dysfunction and, in rare cases, permanent pudendal nerve injury. In response, several techniques for performing postless hip arthroscopy have been developed in recent years. Although some of these techniques are commercially available and some are "do-it-yourself," preliminary evidence has shown minimal risk of groin-related complications with these postless techniques. In addition to reducing complication rates, our research revealed significantly better patient-reported outcomes with postless compared with post-assisted hip arthroscopy at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Groin-related complications during hip arthroscopy are confusing and anxiety-producing to patients. Hip arthroscopy is an elective procedure, and patients do not expect to have any groin symptoms after a hip surgery. Because this is a sensitive issue, the potential for groin-related complications is rarely discussed with patients preoperatively. In addition, patients often are confused and reluctant to mention groin-related complications to their surgeon, especially if these symptoms are short-lived. Postless hip arthroscopy is a readily accessible, safe alternative to using a perineal post and should be adopted as the standard of care sooner rather than later.

Identifiers

PMID40041844
PMCPMC11873454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.