ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
A Bibliometric Review of the Top 100 Most Cited Articles in Hip Preservation, Not Counting Self-Citations.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To summarize the characteristics of the top 100 most-cited publications related to hip preservation, not counting self-citation. Methods: Databases accessible through ISI Web of Science were queried for articles related to hip preservation between 1965 and June 2022. Analysis included citation number, visual network mapping, publication year, geographic distribution, authorship, impact factor, citation density, and institution. Data analysis was performed excluding self-citations. Results: The top 100 most cited articles in hip preservation had citations ranging between 151 and 2,001, with publication years between 1965 and 2018. An increase in citation density over time was observed. Fifty-seven percent of articles were from the United States, 23% from Switzerland, and 8% from Canada; 57% of the articles were published in the 2000s, and a majority were Level IV Evidence (n = 62). Conclusions: The 100 most-cited articles in hip preservation, not counting self-citation, were published between 1965 and 2018. Citation density increased over time. The majority of articles were published in the United States and in Level of Evidence: Level IV, descriptive epidemiology study using large database.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.