ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
Multidisciplinary Team Discussions and the Inclusion of Individualized Patient Factors May Improve Informed Consent in Sports Medicine.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking elite sport as high-stakes work: an organizational perspective on well-being and sustainable performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Informed consent allows for the maintenance of patient autonomy and is essential in establishing trusting relationships between physicians and their patients. This process involves thorough discussion of the risks and alternatives, as well as the short- and long-term outcomes, of proposed treatment options. Inadequacies with informed consent can lead to inferior patient outcomes and may be subject to severe legal consequences. Individualized discussions are warranted to address the questions of these patients, whether it be the high-level athlete or the weekend warrior. This review highlights factors, identifies barriers, and proposes potential solutions to improve informed consent within orthopaedic sports medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.