ArticleHealth science reports2025
Assessing the Significance and Progression of Too Small to Characterize Lesions in Hepatic CT Scans of Patients With a Cancer History: A Two-Center Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: During staging computed tomography (CT) of patients with cancer, lesions that are too small to characterize (TSTC) on the liver are frequently observed. Considering the significance of these lesions, this study aimed to evaluate the relevance and progression of TSTC lesions on hepatic CT scans in patients with a history of cancer. Method: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 50 patients with a history of cancer who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans. These patients were referred to Ghaem Hospital and Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad, between March 2022 and 2023. In this study, demographic and clinical information were documented. The CT scans of all patients included in the study were evaluated by two experienced radiologists who assessed the number and size of TSTC lesions. Next, each patient was called to perform a follow-up CT scan 6 months later. Then, the size and number of TSTC lesions were compared with the values recorded in the previous round, and their progress was evaluated. Results: The study included 50 patients, of which 46% were male and 54% were female. The mean patients' age was 54.88 ± 13.60 years. In the following CT scan, among the patients with TSTC lesions, nine (18%) had liver metastases, while 41 (82%) did not. There was no significant difference between the groups with and without metastases in terms of the number of TSTC lesions ( Conclusion: The incidence of metastasis in individuals with TSTC lesions was 18%, higher than that reported in similar studies. The identification of these lesions is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.