ArticleHealth science reports2025
Continuous Skin Rejuvenation by Combining Nonablative Fractional Laser With Daily Application of a Multibeneficial Composition Formulation: A Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06140628 (Clinical Study on 28 Day Continuous Improvement of Post-rejuvenation-treatment Skin With Formulations of A Proprietary Anti-aging Complex Composition), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Study on 28 Day Continuous Improvement of Post-rejuvenation-treatment Skin With Formulations of A Proprietary Anti-aging Complex Composition
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Skin aging is a common concern among individuals, and laser treatments are recognized as one of the most effective approaches to mitigate the aging process. The study aims to compare a multibeneficial formula serum versus a blank formulation in achieving maximum efficacy following a single treatment of nonablative fractional laser for facial skin rejuvenation. Methods: This study was a double-blind, split-face, monocentric, randomized clinical trial in China (September 24, 2023-March 07, 2024), and 37 patients seeking the Fotona 4D laser treatment for aging-related facial changes were enrolled. After one full-face laser treatment, each patient applied the test serum to one side and the blank formulation to the other, randomly, twice daily for 28 days. Two dermatologists assessed facial skin quality and aging signs at baseline and Day 0 (D0, immediately after the laser treatment), D3, D7, D14, and D28. Noninvasive measurement and self-assessment questionnaires were also administered at each visit. According to the types of variables, appropriate statistical tests, including the Friedman test, ANOVA test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, were used to examine the within-groups or between-groups differences. Results: Thirty-three women, aged 35-49 years, completed the study. After 28 days of the test serum application, the visual clinical scores rated by investigators showed more significantly beneficial changes on the test side than those on the control. More significant improvements in index parameters for the test sides were also found both in wrinkles with a 21.14% decrease of SEw value from the baseline and in elasticity with a 14.99% decrease of R2 value, while the corresponding reductions were 3.83% for SEw and 4.10% for R2 found on the control sides. The reduction of the nasolabial folds area proportion, analyzed by Primos, was 10.61% on the test sides and 3.39% on the control. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The serum with a multi-beneficial composition can contribute to achieving a more significant and sustainable efficacy after the Fotona 4D treatment in skin rejuvenation improvement. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06140628.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.