Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041759›Full record

ReviewBiomedicine hub

Neuroimaging-Based Responses to Blood Pressure Augmentation in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Rudy Goh, Shaddy El-Masri, Daniel Zweck, Dominic Spicer, Felix Ng, Stephen Bacchi, Jim Jannes, Timothy Kleinig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rudy GohSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Shaddy El-MasriSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Daniel ZweckSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Dominic SpicerSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Felix NgMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Stephen BacchiSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jim JannesSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Timothy KleinigSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In acute ischaemic stroke, the key treatment to reduce infarct growth is reperfusion, achieved through thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, or endogenous reperfusion. Prior to definitive reperfusion therapy, blood pressure augmentation may enhance cerebral perfusion and reduce interim infarct growth. This study aimed to summarise the existing evidence from randomised controlled trials on the use of imaging for patient selection and the assessment of blood pressure augmentation in acute ischaemic stroke. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of the databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO. Results: Initial searches returned 266 results, of which 4 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Most identified studies did not utilise imaging for patient selection and the assessment of blood pressure augmentation in ischaemic stroke. Only two studies utilised magnetic resonance imaging and/or magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for patient selection, while one study used non-contrast CT brain. No studies utilised CT perfusion imaging for patient selection or outcome assessment post-blood pressure augmentation. There is also a lack of evidence regarding the association between specific perfusion imaging parameters, such as cerebral blood volume and delay time, and clinical outcomes post-blood pressure augmentation. Conclusion: Imaging is a potentially valuable surrogate marker of cerebral perfusion, yet it has not been routinely used for patient selection and assessment in blood pressure augmentation in acute ischaemic stroke trials. Additional research is required to determine its utility in assessing the efficacy of blood pressure augmentation in ischaemic stroke.

Indexed as

Blood pressure augmentationBlood pressure manipulation pressor therapyIschaemic strokeNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID40041759
PMCPMC11879148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.