ReviewBiomedicine hub
Neuroimaging-Based Responses to Blood Pressure Augmentation in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.
Review in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blood Pressure Management Pre- and Post-Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Evidence and Insights from Recent Studies.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In acute ischaemic stroke, the key treatment to reduce infarct growth is reperfusion, achieved through thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, or endogenous reperfusion. Prior to definitive reperfusion therapy, blood pressure augmentation may enhance cerebral perfusion and reduce interim infarct growth. This study aimed to summarise the existing evidence from randomised controlled trials on the use of imaging for patient selection and the assessment of blood pressure augmentation in acute ischaemic stroke. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of the databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO. Results: Initial searches returned 266 results, of which 4 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Most identified studies did not utilise imaging for patient selection and the assessment of blood pressure augmentation in ischaemic stroke. Only two studies utilised magnetic resonance imaging and/or magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for patient selection, while one study used non-contrast CT brain. No studies utilised CT perfusion imaging for patient selection or outcome assessment post-blood pressure augmentation. There is also a lack of evidence regarding the association between specific perfusion imaging parameters, such as cerebral blood volume and delay time, and clinical outcomes post-blood pressure augmentation. Conclusion: Imaging is a potentially valuable surrogate marker of cerebral perfusion, yet it has not been routinely used for patient selection and assessment in blood pressure augmentation in acute ischaemic stroke trials. Additional research is required to determine its utility in assessing the efficacy of blood pressure augmentation in ischaemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.