ArticleNeurology. Education2025
Curriculum Innovations: Teaching Residents About Guideline Development and Cost-Conscious Care: A Mixed-Method Evaluation Study.
Article in Neurology. Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building capacity for clinical practice guideline development: Experiences from Malawi, Nigeria and South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Problem Statement: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can play a crucial role in achieving better and more cost-efficient health care. This requires training health care providers in CPG development. This study presents results of design-based research on a training program based on the learning theory of problem-based learning, following the underlying principles of active, authentic, collaborative, and blended learning. Objectives: The CoCoCare training aims to equip neurology residents with insight in CPG development (including cost aspects) and understanding of how to apply CPGs in clinical practice. Methods and Curriculum Description: The CoCoCare training consisted of 6 asynchronous e-learning modules, synchronous workshops (1 day onsite in run 1 and dispersed online sessions in run 2), and a series of online assignments mimicking the steps of CPG development. Participants could present their draft guidelines at the European Academy of Neurology conference. Between 2019 and 2021, 55 participants from 21 European member states participated in the training. A mixed-method design-based research study design was used to collect questionnaire and interview data from participants and trainers. Results and Assessment Data: Participants felt that the training prepared them to participate in CPG development and that they had learned how to critically appraise a guideline and were stimulated to apply guidelines in practice. Trainers were also positive and observed an upward trend in the knowledge of the participants. Participants especially appreciated the active (assignments) and authentic learning in the practical part of the training, but the workload of the assignments in combination with clinical work was a challenge. They also enjoyed the collaborative learning in an international group of residents but asked for more interaction and support during the period dedicated to assignments. Discussion and Lessons Learned: The CoCoCare training program proved to be a feasible and unique, international guideline development training with a focus on cost-efficient care. Recommendations include to arrange accreditation, ensure regular interaction between trainers and participants, review the workload of assignments, and look at possibilities to provide feedback. Future research should evaluate the impact on CPG application and participation in CPG development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.