Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041701›Full record

ArticleISME communications2025

Internal transcribed spacers enable species-level Metataxonomic analysis of ciliated protozoa.

Sripoorna Somasundaram, Zhongtang Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sripoorna SomasundaramDepartment of Animal Sciences, Animal Science Building, 2029 Fyffe Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Zhongtang YuDepartment of Animal Sciences, Animal Science Building, 2029 Fyffe Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional morphology-based ciliate classification is often time-consuming and inaccurate, necessitating molecular approaches. Although 18S rRNA gene sequencing is widely used for taxonomic analyses of ciliates, its high degree of conservation makes it challenging to achieve species-level resolution. This study explores the potential of internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) and the 28S rRNA gene to improve taxonomic resolution beyond that offered by 18S rRNA gene in free-living and host-associated ciliates. A comparative analysis of ITS, the 18S, and 28S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from public databases indicated that ITS regions exhibit greater inter- and intra-specific sequence dissimilarity compared to 18S rRNA gene, supporting existing literature. We then designed universal primers targeting the ITS and 28S rRNA gene for freshwater and rumen ciliates. These primers were rigorously evaluated for their inclusiveness, specificity, and amplification efficiency using

Indexed as

free-living ciliatesinternal transcribed spacersribosomal RNA genesrumen ciliates

Identifiers

PMID40041701
PMCPMC11879186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.