ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral arterial and venous visualization in dogs: a comparative study of time-of-flight, phase-contrast, and time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics sequences.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Cervical internal vertebral venous plexus thrombosis diagnosed using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in a dog.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Case Report: Preliminary evaluation of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics magnetic resonance imaging for assessing temporal enhancement patterns in small animal head and neck tumors.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of vascular characteristics in intracranial and extracranial tumors in veterinary patients.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequences-Time-of-Flight (TOF), Phase-Contrast (PC), and Time-Resolved Imaging of Contrast Kinetics (TRICKS)-in visualizing cerebral arteries and veins in dogs. The goal is to determine the most suitable MRA sequence for improving diagnostic accuracy in canine cerebral imaging. Five healthy adult beagles underwent imaging using a 1.5-T MRI system. Quantitative measures, including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), were calculated, and qualitative evaluations of vessel delineation and visualization symmetry were performed by blinded observers. The three sequences were statistically compared using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. All dogs completed the imaging protocols without any complications. TOF MRA showed the best results for visualizing cerebral arteries, with the highest SNR and CNR in major arteries like the basilar, rostral, caudal cerebral, and caudal communicating arteries. TRICKS MRA performed better than TOF and PC for venous imaging, achieving higher SNR or CNR in most veins, including the transverse, temporal, straight sinus and dorsal cerebral vein, and had the shortest acquisition time. In qualitative evaluations, TOF MRA demonstrated acceptable or higher vascular visibility in most of brain arteries. All venous structures were significantly better visualized with TRICKS MRA compared to TOF MRA. Interobserver agreement was high, showing consistency in the results. These findings suggest that TOF is best for artery imaging, while TRICKS is ideal for venous imaging and faster procedures. TOF is recommended for clear and detailed imaging of cerebral arteries, while TRICKS is more suitable for imaging veins and situations where faster scans are needed. These results provide a basis for improving MRA techniques in veterinary medicine, helping to make diagnoses more accurate and procedures more efficient in both clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.