ArticleEJHaem2025
Haploidentical Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation as a Superior Alternative for Patients With Mismatch Donors-A Single Center Experience in 152 Patients.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes of critically ill pediatric patients after haploidentical stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a key treatment for hematologic malignancies, but donor selection impacts outcomes. Results: In a cohort of 152 patients undergoing allo-SCT from 2012 to 2023, haploidentical donors with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) showed superior survival compared to 9/10 mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD). Cox regression analysis revealed that patients not in complete remission (CR) before transplantation particularly benefited from haplo donors, while those with 9/10 MMUD and lacking CR had worse outcomes. Conclusion: These results highlight the importance of donor selection, suggesting that haplo donors with PTCy may be preferable for patients not in CR, necessitating alternative approaches for others. Clinical trial registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.