ArticleCureus2025
Navigating Through the Diagnostic Challenges Involved in Artery of Percheron Infarction in a Young Stroke Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artery of Percheron (AOP) infarction is a rare but clinically important cause of unilateral or bilateral thalamic infarction, commonly with a heterogeneous presentation and nonspecific neurological symptoms. In contrast to unilateral thalamic strokes, AOP infarction can present a unique hurdle for diagnostic considerations owing to its atypical clinical manifestation and the lack of widespread knowledge of this anatomic variant among clinicians. AOP infarction is associated with potentially better outcomes if it is diagnosed early, as timely and appropriate interventions can greatly affect the outcome. This case of a 39-year-old Indian female emphasizes the necessity of taking AOP infarction into account in the differential diagnosis of patients with acute symptoms of central nervous system dysfunction, particularly when initial imaging is nondiagnostic or when clinical features such as altered mental status, visual disturbances, or cognitive impairment are present. This highlights the challenges encountered in diagnosing and treating the condition while also necessitating a thorough history-taking and study of symptomatology. Early diagnosis, the use of appropriate imaging techniques, and timely treatment help increase the chances of good functional outcomes and reduce long-term neurological deficits, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.