ArticleCureus2025
Siddha COVID Care Centers in Tamil Nadu, India: Coverage, Workload, and Knowledge Gaps.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted India since March 2020. The Siddha system of medicine is one of the oldest medical systems and originated in Tamil Nadu. It is popular among countries where Tamil-speaking populations live. In recent years, it has controlled epidemics like dengue and chikungunya in Tamil Nadu. Siddha COVID Care Centers (SCCCs) were established in Tamil Nadu to support COVID-19 management. This study assesses the coverage, workload, and gaps associated with these SCCCs. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in June-July 2021, including all SCCCs, with five patients selected from each center. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze facilities, patient demographics, and medical provisions, focusing on hygiene practices, patient care, and Siddha treatment utilization. Patient adherence to preventive measures was also assessed. Results Data were collected from 46 SCCCs, involving 155 patients and 46 physicians. Most SCCCs were located in educational institutions like colleges, schools, or public utility halls like marriage halls and indoor auditoriums (n = 43; 93%). Essential resources such as tap water (n = 30; 65.2%), hand sanitizer (n = 34; 73.9%), and soap (n = 33; 71.7%) were available. Most centers had infrared thermometers, pulse oximeters (n = 41; 89.1%), and BP apparatus (n = 44; 95.6%). Trained Siddha physicians were present in most centers (n = 46; 100%). By June 2021, 15,744 patients had been admitted, with 929 referred to other facilities and 287 discharged against medical advice. Conclusions The study highlights the comprehensive approach of SCCCs, incorporating Siddha medicine, dietary interventions, and psychological support. While effective, challenges included resource limitations and the need for better integration of traditional medicine in future pandemic responses. These findings provide valuable insights for public health authorities considering Siddha medicine in pandemic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.