ArticlePNAS nexus2025
AI-enabled manufacturing process discovery.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discovering manufacturing processes has been largely experienced-based. We propose a shift to a systematic approach driven by dependencies between energy inputs and performance outputs. Uncovering these dependencies across diverse process classes requires a universal language that characterizes process inputs and performances. Traditional manufacturing languages, with their individualized syntax and terminology, hinder the characterization across varying length scales and energy inputs. To enable the evaluation of process dependencies, we propose a broad manufacturing language that facilitates the characterization of diverse process classes, which include energy inputs, tool-material interactions, material compatibility, and performance outputs. We analyze the relationships between these characteristics by constructing a dataset of over 50 process classes, which we use to train a variational autoencoder (VAE) model. This generative model encodes our dataset into a 2D latent space, where we can explore, select, and generate processes based on desired performances and retrieve the corresponding process characteristics. After verifying the dependencies derived from the VAE model match with existing knowledge on manufacturing processes, we demonstrate the usefulness of using the model to discover new potential manufacturing processes through three illustrative cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.