ArticleBMJ neurology open2025
Clinical data and reporting quality in NMDAR-antibody encephalitis and pregnancy: a systematic review.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis Associated with Ovarian Teratoma: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Encephalitis: Current, Future Therapies, Unmet Need and Patient Management.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody encephalitis (NMDAR-Ab-E) can have an onset during, after or prior to a pregnancy. In animal models, transplacental NMDAR immunoglobulin G transfer can affect neurodevelopment. In contrast, clinical reports of mothers affected by NMDAR-Ab-E typically are reassuring. We systematically reviewed maternal, infant and childhood clinical data pertaining to NMDAR-Ab-E with an onset before, during or after pregnancy and compared this to our single autoimmune neurology centre experience. Methods: After pre-registration on PROSPERO (CRD42023408447), we searched PubMed and Scopus for NMDAR-Ab-E case reports/series with an onset before, during or after pregnancy (last search 19/10/2023). We extracted maternal, neonatal and childhood outcomes using an idealised checklist to derive summary statistics. Results: After quality control, we identified 66 pregnancies in 61 women from 48 reports or series. 72% of women recovered with minimal or no neurological deficits, comparable to non-pregnancy-associated NMDAR-Ab-E. Likewise, 80% of pregnancies resulted in live births with a single neonatal death reported. Data on neonatal outcome measures were frequently unreported, and childhood follow-up was provided in only 60%. Our centre's experience is consistent: 3/4 mothers recovered with no functional deficits and 7/8 children without evidence of compromise at a median follow-up of 2 years. Conclusions: Current evidence does not overall suggest unfavourable maternal, fetal or childhood outcomes after NMDAR-Ab-E. However, the available sample is small, predominantly single case reports with modest follow-up, lacks standardisation, and data are often incomplete. Future approaches should address these caveats: developing multi-centre collaboration towards an international registry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.