Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041568›Full record

ArticlePlant diversity2025

Assembly-free reads accurate identification (AFRAID) approach outperforms other methods of DNA barcoding in the walnut family (Juglandaceae).

Yanlei Liu, Kai Chen, Lihu Wang, Xinqiang Yu, Chao Xu, Zhili Suo, Shiliang Zhou, Shuo Shi, Wenpan Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. DipSkmer: Reference-free population genomics with diploid genome skims.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification of intraspecific cultivarFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yanlei LiuSchool of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Kai ChenSchool of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Lihu WangSchool of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Xinqiang YuSchool of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Chao XuState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Zhili SuoState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Shiliang ZhouState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Shuo ShiCollege of Life Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China.
Wenpan DongSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA barcoding has been extensively used for species identification. However, species identification of mixed samples or degraded DNA is limited by current DNA barcoding methods. In this study, we use plant species in Juglandaceae to evaluate an assembly-free reads accurate identification (AFRAID) method of species identification, a novel approach for precise species identification in plants. Specifically, we determined (1) the accuracy of DNA barcoding approaches in delimiting species in Juglandaceae, (2) the minimum size of chloroplast dataset for species discrimination, and (3) minimum amount of next generation sequencing (NGS) data required for species identification. We found that species identification rates were highest when whole chloroplast genomes were used, followed by taxon-specific DNA barcodes, and then universal DNA barcodes. Species identification of 100% was achieved when chloroplast genome sequence coverage reached 20% and the original sequencing data reached 500,000 reads. AFRAID accurately identified species for all samples tested after 500,000 clean reads, with far less computing time than common approaches. These results provide a new approach to accurately identify species, overcoming limitations of traditional DNA barcodes. Our method, which uses next generation sequencing to generate partial chloroplast genomes, reveals that DNA barcode regions are not necessarily fixed, accelerating the process of species identification.

Indexed as

Assembly-freeDNA barcodeJuglandaceaeRandom DNA barcodeSpecies identification

Identifiers

PMID40041568
PMCPMC11873577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.