ArticlePlant diversity2025
Modeling compositional heterogeneity resolves deep phylogeny of flowering plants.
Article in Plant diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative taxonomy and mitogenome characterization of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne silvestris.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Phylogenomics unravels the early divergence and diversification in Bignoniaceae.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiosperms experienced one of the most remarkable radiations of land plants and are now the dominant autotrophs in terrestrial ecosystems. Recent phylogenomic studies based on large-scale data from plastid, mitochondrial, or nuclear transcriptomes/genomes and increased taxon sampling have provided unprecedent resolution into the phylogeny of flowering plants. However, owing to ancient rapid radiations, the interrelationships among the five lineages of Mesangiospermae, the vast majority of angiosperms, remain contentious. Here we show that, although plastid and mitochondrial genomes lack sufficient phylogenetic signal for resolving deeper phylogeny, the relationships among five mesangiosperm lineages can be confidently resolved under better-fitting models using genome-scale data. According to our Bayesian cross-validation and model test in a maximum likelihood framework, site-heterogeneous models (e.g., CAT-GTR + G4, LG + C20 + F + G) outperform site-homogeneous or partition models often used in previous studies. Under site-heterogeneous models, the approximately unbiased test favored our preferred tree recovered from various datasets: Ceratophyllales (coontails) are robustly recovered as sister to monocots, and they together are sister to the clade comprising magnoliids, Chloranthales, and eudicots. Our phylogenomic analyses resolve the last enigma of the deeper phylogeny of angiosperms and emphasize the efficacy of modeling compositional heterogeneity in resolving rapid radiations of plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.