ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Does body mass index influence intraoperative costs and operative times for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? A time-driven activity-based costing analysis.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of morbid obesity and metabolic syndrome in elective spine surgery outcomes: A systematic review.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The increasing prevalence of obesity has raised concerns about its impact on surgical outcomes and healthcare costs. This study evaluates the influence of Body Mass Index (BMI) on intraoperative costs and operative times during open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) procedures using a Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) approach. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 279 patients who underwent TLIF between 2019 and 2022. Patients were categorized into 5 BMI cohorts: healthy weight (BMI 18.5-24.99), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.99), Class I obese (BMI 30.0-34.99), Class II obese (BMI 35.0-39.99), and Class III obese (BMI >40). Intraoperative costs were calculated using TDABC methodology, with costs segmented into supply and personnel expenses. Operative times were measured in 3 phases: surgery time (incision to closure), OR time (patient entering to leaving), and turnover time. Multivariable regression models assessed the relationship between BMI and various intraoperative time and cost metrics, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: BMI was significantly associated with increased operative times and personnel costs. Each unit increase in BMI corresponded to an additional 1.90 minutes in the operating room (p = .01) and a $25.72 increase in personnel costs (p = .008). However, no significant association was found between BMI and total or supply costs. Regression analyses indicated that obese patients did not significantly differ from healthy weight patients in terms of total intraoperative costs. Conclusions: Higher BMI is associated with increased operative times and personnel costs in TLIF procedures, though it does not significantly impact total intraoperative costs when controlling for confounders. These findings suggest that BMI may not need to be a significant deterrent in patient selection for TLIF under bundled payment models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.