ArticleVeterinary world2025
Seroprevalence of
Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Leptospirosis, caused by Materials and Methods: Study sites were selected across Jordan based on previous research showing a high likelihood of zoonotic pathogen circulation. The study population comprised 500 individuals and 400 livestock (sheep, goats, cattle, and camels). Blood samples were collected from both humans and livestock at baseline and at follow-up after 1.5 years. Humans were followed longitudinally, whereas livestock were sampled opportunistically. The samples were tested for Results: At baseline, the seroprevalence of leptospirosis in humans was 4.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5-6.1), with exposure detected across all five sites. The incidence rate of human leptospirosis was 1145 cases/100,000 person-years (95% CI: 455-2,321). In livestock, the baseline seroprevalence was 1.7% (95% CI: 0.79-3.7), which increased to 4.3% (95% CI: 2.6-6.9) at follow-up. Conclusion: This study highlights the presence and dynamics of leptospirosis at the human-animal interface in Jordan, revealing a baseline human seroprevalence of 4.0% and an incidence rate of 1145 cases per 100,000 person-years. Among livestock, seroprevalence increased from 1.7% to 4.3% over the study period, with exposure limited to sheep and goats. These findings underscore the importance of targeted public health and veterinary interventions to address zoonotic leptospirosis in endemic areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.