ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Pharmacovigilance analysis of polatuzumab plus bendamustine and rituximab treatment protocol: identifying comprehensive safety signals using FDA database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polatuzumab vedotin-containing regimens as bridge to CART: analysis from the CART-SIE study.Blood advances · 2026Observational
- Smart Thrombosis Care: The Rise of Closed-Loop Diagnosis-to-Treatment Nano Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The combination of polatuzumab, bendamustine and rituximab (pola+BR) was authorized for the treatment of relapsed or refractory Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This study used the FDA database to identify safety signals related to the treatment protocol. Methods: The adverse events (AEs) from 2019Q1 to 2023Q3 were analyzed by calculating the reporting odds ratio. Severe and non-severe cases were compared using either an independent samples t-test or chi-squared (χ Results: In all database, 58 significant signals were detected within 1,597 patients accepting the treatment protocol. Common AEs like neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy, as well as other AEs like anaemia, sepsis, cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were a major focus. In addtion, 51.7%, 45.6% and 1.7% were sorted into low, moderate and high priority in term of clinical importance, respectively. Unexpected significant signals included intestinal obstruction, epilepsy, deep vein thrombosis, haemorrhage, increased blood lactate dehydrogenase and hypercalcemia. Conclusion: Our study identified significant AE signals for pola+BR through realworld disproportionality analysis data and analyzed the severity and clinical priority of these signals, which can assist clinicians in managing related AEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.